During the trial, LLF lawyers managed to prove that the Inspectorate had incorrectly qualified the developer’s actions, that the report was unreliable, and that there was no offense. To strengthen the position of the lawyers, the conclusion of a construction and technical specialist was submitted to the court. In these circumstances, the court found that the contested decision contained an incorrect qualification of the offense. The unlawfulness of bringing to administrative responsibility was confirmed by the courts of appeal and cassation instances.

Сообщение PROTECTED A LARGE DEVELOPER FROM AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE FOR INAPPROPRIATE USE OF LAND IN THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR появились сначала на Land Law Firm.

LLF lawyers proved that at the moment of transferring the land plot to the client, the authorized body knew the characteristics of the building in terms of the controversial extension. As one of the tools to prove the history of the site and to strengthen the case, the lawyers used satellite imagery. The practice-based defense strategy using the findings of the construction and technical expertise allowed LLF lawyers to refute other arguments of the plaintiff, in particular, the lack of a building permit and violation of the purposes of the site grant. Thanks to the professional approach of Land Law Firm, as well as harmonious work with the team of the internal legal service, the case was won.

Сообщение LAND LAW FIRM TEAM PROTECTED THE RETAILER AGAINST DEMOLITION OF A PART OF THE SUPERMARKET BUILDING появились сначала на Land Law Firm.

Сообщение PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE INVESTOR IN THE DISPUTE WITH THE MINISTRY OF PROPERTY RELATIONS появились сначала на Land Law Firm.